P01-04 – Lecture 4: Early Modern History IV “The Fraternity: A Case Study of the Doshōmachi Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild”

Hero Image: the Doshōmachi Fraternity Documents
Owned by the Doshōmachi Pharmaceutical Archive
道修町文書 くすりの道修町資料館所蔵

Introduction

  During last session, we examined the urban neighborhood (association), which served as the basic unit of daily life in the early modern city.  In our analysis, we focused on the case of Osaka’s Doshōmachi 3-chōme neighborhood.  During this session, however, we will examine another important urban social organization, the fraternity (nakama).  In addition to the licensed occupational fraternities established by merchants and artisans, members of the hinin and kawata status groups, performers, and religious practitioners also formed self-governing fraternal organizations.  An 1808 record from the Osaka City Governor’s Office contains a comprehensive list of all of the city’s late Edo-era occupational fraternities.  It includes fraternities that engaged in the distribution of goods, including fish, produce, rice, materia medica, and oil brokers and wholesalers, fraternities that engaged in financial activities, such as money changing and pawn broking, and fraternities whose members engaged in the provision of a specific service, including teahouses, bathhouses, and inns.  As the list indicates, a large number and diverse array of fraternal organizations existed in early nineteenth-century Osaka.   This week, we will focus on the case of Osaka’s Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild.  The members of Osaka’s Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild lived together in the Doshōmachi 1-chōme, 2-chōme, and 3-chōme neighborhoods. 

 

1. What is a Licensed Fraternity?

The term “licensed fraternity” (kabu nakama) refers to an association of individuals who own a specific sort of occupational license.  Generally speaking, the term “license” (kabu) can be understood as the right to engage in a specific trade.  Although there were some exceptions, the number of licenses for most trades were restricted.  Under the early modern fraternity system, the right to engage in a specific trade was, as a general rule, limited to the licensed members of officially-sanctioned occupational fraternities.  At the same time, unlicensed merchants and artisans were, in principle, excluded from fraternal organizations and prohibited from plying their trade without proper certification.  Of course, an examination of actual economic activity reveals that the engagement of unlicensed actors (shirōto) in various trades was unavoidable.  Licensed occupational fraternities, which were officially sanctioned by the Bakufu, made monetary offerings to the authorities.  By doing so, the members of those fraternities sought to engage the Bakufu in the regulation of unlicensed competitors.  At the same time, the Bakufu attempted to regulate merchants and artisans using the framework of the licensed fraternity. 

Made by Sachiko Watanabe

 During the first half of the early modern period, fraternal organizations developed within individual professions.  However, it was only in the mid-eighteenth century that the Bakufu began sanctioning such organizations on a broad scale.  In 1842, however, the Bakufu issued the Edict Disbanding Licensed Fraternities.   That Edict was one of the key economic policies implemented during the Tenpō reforms and was intended to lower commodity prices.  It was short-lived, however, as fraternal organizations were reestablished in 1851.  Despite that fact, we cannot overlook the vigorous and wide-ranging economic activities in which merchants and artisans traditionally unaffiliated with occupational fraternities engaged between 1842 and 1851.  During that brief period, there were no limits on the number of individuals who engage in a given trade and many formerly unlicensed actors thrived. 

 As in the case of urban neighborhoods, licensed occupational fraternities established independent organizational regulations.  In addition, although the structure of these fraternities varied depending on the occupation, officers, including annual and monthly representatives, were appointed to administer fraternity affairs and regulate fraternity constituents.  In order to further our analysis of these fraternal organizations, let us now examine the case of Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild. 

 

2. The Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild

 In Doshōmachi 2-chōme, there is a Shinto shrine known as Sukunahikona Shrine, or Shinnō-san.  Enshrined there is the Chinese god of medicine, Shinnō (Shennong).  The shrine is located on the former site of the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild Office.  It was established in 1780, when the Shinnō deity was transferred to Doshōmachi from Kyoto’s Gojōten Shrine.  Even after the transfer, however, the shrine grounds continued to serve as the location of the Guild Office.  A massive volume of documents produced by the Guild were stored, during the Edo period, at the Guild Office.  Many of those documents have been carefully preserved and are currently displayed at the Doshōmachi Pharmaceutical Archive. 

 During the second half of the seventeenth century, materia medica merchants gathered in the Doshōmachi area.  Unlike retailers that sold oral medicines and ointments, however, the merchants in Doshōmachi did not sell market-ready drugs.  Rather, they bought and sold materia medica used to produce herbal medicines.  During this period, those ingredients were mostly foreign in origin, imported from the Asian mainland via Nagasaki.  Entering the eighteenth century, however, domestic producers from across Japan began manufacturing medicinal ingredients.  Domestically-produced ingredients circulated under the name Japanese materia medica (wayakushu).  In 1722, the Bakufu established the Regulatory Office for Domestic Medicines in order to ensure the quality of domestically-produced materia medica and prevent the circulation of fake medicines and poisonous pharmaceuticals.  In Osaka, the city’s 124 licensed materia medica wholesalers, who possessed the ability to evaluate the quality and safety of materia medica, were appointed to administer the local Regulatory Office for Domestic Medicines.   In conjunction with their appointment, the Doshōmachi Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild received official sanction from the Bakufu.  What is more, the Guild remained in place even after the Regulatory Office for Domestic Medicines was abolished in 1738. 

 

Now let us examine the role that Osaka’s materia medica wholesalers played in the distribution of materia medica during the Edo period. Please examine this diagram, which explains how imported materia medica were distributed during the early modern period.

Made by Sachiko Watanabe

 All of the materia medica imported to Nagasaki were purchased by the Bakufu.  They then auctioned off the ingredients to a group of specially-licensed merchants at a facility known as the Nagasaki Kaisho.  These specially-licensed merchants were from five cities: Sakai, Nagasaki, Kyoto, Edo, and Osaka.  They were granted special licenses during the early Edo period under the auspices of the Bakufu’s importation system.  Under that system, access to foreign goods was limited to a select group of influential merchants.  There were approximately 15 such merchants from Osaka.  Nearly all of the materials purchased by those specially-licensed merchants were shipped to licensed brokers in Osaka who mediated the sale of imported materia medica. Those brokers then sold off those materials to wholesalers in Osaka and materia medica brokers in Edo and other parts of the country.  Importantly, Osaka’s materia medica brokers only mediated the sale of the medicinal ingredients.  They did not buy and sell the materials they brokered.  In addition, Osaka’s materia medica brokers mediated the exchange of a variety of imported goods, not just medicinal ingredients.  Those brokers established an occupational fraternity known as the Fraternity of Imported Materia medica Brokers, which was comprised of approximately 200 licensed members.  Osaka’s materia medica wholesalers purchased imported materia medica from these brokers in units contained in wooden chests, which were known as hitsu.  After ascertaining the quality of the ingredients, wholesalers then broke them down into smaller portions and sold them to retailers in Osaka and other parts of the country. 

 As noted above, Osaka’s imported materia medica brokers were simply mediators.  They received chests containing medicinal ingredients from specially-licensed merchants who traveled to Nagasaki and then passed them on without alteration to wholesalers, who were the actual buyers.  Unlike wholesalers, therefore, these pharmaceutical brokers did not possess the ability to evaluate the quality of the medicinal ingredients they were sent.  When wholesalers came to purchase ingredients, the average weight of individual portions was determined using a method known as shomi-mawashi and the base price was set using a method known as negumi.  These were important decisions which affected methods of exchange and market prices around the country.  As this suggests, the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild played a key role in the distribution of imported materia medica.  Although the members of the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild also played an important role in the exchange of domestically produced medicinal ingredients shipped to Osaka, I will not be discussing that role in detail here. 

 

3. The Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild and Archival Records

  As I mentioned above, the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild left behind a wide vast collection of archival records.  Currently, that collection contains more than 30,000 documents.  I will introduce some of them.

The part of record from the twelfth month of 1799 in “A Registry of Licensed Materia Medica Wholesalers”
owned by the Doshomachi Pharmaceutical Archive

This is a document entitled “A Registry of Licensed Materia Medica Wholesalers” from the twelfth month of 1799.  Occupational fraternities that were officially sanctioned by the Bakufu produced registries in which they explained the series of events leading up to and events surrounding their sanctioning, and listed important regulations that their constituents were required to uphold.  These registries were sealed by all licensed members of the fraternity and submitted to the City Governor’s Office.  In addition, fraternity members prepared a second copy which was stored in the fraternity’s office.  The Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild was no exception.  Their registry explains that the Guild received official sanction in Kyōhō 7 (1722) in conjunction with the establishment of the Regulatory Office for Domestic Medicines.  In addition, it contains a list of regulations concerning the handling of domestic materia medica, noxious medicines, and fake materia medica. 

 Initially, there were 124 licensed members of the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild.  However, at the time that this registry was composed, the authorities granted the Guild five additional licenses.  As a result, it contains 129 signatures.  In addition, the registry has been amended using notes, which detail changes in the ownership of licenses resulting from succession and exchange.  Also, adult proxies commonly signed these registries when the owner of a license was still too young to do so themselves.  Accordingly, this registry contains a series of corrections indicating a change of proxy or a change of residence on the part of the license’s owner.  As time passed, the number of corrections would gradually increase.  As a result, fraternity registries quickly became unmanageable.  Consequently, fraternities produced new registries once every 15 to 20 years.  New registries, such as the one composed in 1722, were then submitted to the City Governor’s Office. 

  Even though the record in question is a registry of licensed materia medica wholesalers, it is similar to cadastral registers produced in urban neighborhoods, which were updated, when a residential tract exchanged or inherited, using written notes.  In addition, like neighborhoods, fraternities produced their own internal regulations.  The Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild formulated its owned internal agreements and regulations.  Take for example this record entitled “A Record of Agreements about Various Matters”.  I would like to focus on the section that discusses the seventh month of 1752.  It contains the following regulation.  “When a licensed wholesaler attempts to establish a new operation and there are no spaces available along Doshōmachi Boulevard between Doshōmachi 1-chōme and 3-chōme, that individual should be permitted, for the time being, to set up shop along one of the area’s side streets.  However, once a space opens up along Doshōmachi Boulevard, they should relocate there immediately.”  As this section indicates, all licensed materia medica wholesalers were required to live in the three neighborhoods of Doshōmachi 1~3-chōme.  Furthermore, as a general principle, they were required to live along the area’s main thoroughfare, rather than a side street.  For the members of fraternal organizations, it was generally better, from a business perspective, to live along a busy street.  In the case of the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild, however, a policy of concentrated residence was strictly enforced.  This was because the business activities of Guild members were carried out within a carefully constructed framework of mutual regulation.  As persons engaging in the same occupation, the Guild’s members had a shared interest.  Relations within the Guild, however, were more complex.  Members engaged in relations of mutual exchange in which both the buyer and seller were licensed materia medica wholesalers.  Accordingly, a certain degree of mutual caution was essential.  As a consequence, wholesalers formed individualized commercial networks based on kinship relations.  Those networks centered on a main household, which was a materia medica wholesaler, and included branch households, some of which engaged in related occupations.    

 In addition, the documents produced by the Materia Medica Wholesalers’ Guild include regulations which were intended to structure relations with actors from outside the fraternity.  For example, there is a record from 1749 entitled “The Triparty Articles of Agreement.”

The part of record of 1749 in ”The Triparty Articles of Agreement.”
owned by the Doshōmachi Pharmaceutical Archive

  The end of that document contains the following passage.  “At this time, the following articles of agreement have been established on the basis of a consultation between three parties, specially-licensed merchants, brokers, and wholesalers.  Accordingly, they must be upheld by all concerned parties.”  In addition, the document is signed by the members of all three groups.  Notably, this document does not contain comprehensive regulations intended to control exchange between the three parties.  Rather, it primarily contains rules concerning matters which could easily lead to disputes between the parties, such as methods for measuring the weight and setting the price of materia medica, and for handling of small amounts of leftover ingredients.   

 The three groups mentioned above were bound closely together in a network related to the distribution of imported materia medica.  At the same time, however, there were instances in which the interests of the three groups collided.  It is likely that the above agreement was concluded in an effort to resolve such clashes.  Occupational fraternities really did produce a vast array of internal records.  What is more, they were stored and managed at an independent fraternity office. 

 

4. Summary

 As I mentioned at the beginning of today’s lecture, if you visit Doshōmachi today, you quickly notice a large number of building containing pharmaceutical companies.  While Osaka’s materia medica brokers simply mediated the sale of medicinal ingredients, the city’s early modern materia medica wholesalers attained the ability to evaluate the quality and safety of medicinal ingredients.  Entering the Meiji period, that ability ultimately helped them to establish modern pharmaceutical companies.

 During the past four sessions, we examined the structural characteristics of early modern Osaka.  We did primarily through the analysis of basic social organizations of which city residents were part.  As we observed, those organizations left behind a wide array of internal records, which tell us much about the lives and livelihoods of ordinary city dwellers.  In addition, we examined the spatial structure of the Dōtonbori area and discussed its emergence as a bustling center of amusement.   Both Dōtonbori and our focus the last two sessions, Doshōmachi, are parts of the city with an intimate connection to contemporary urban society.  During the weeks ahead, you will learn about the historical trajectory of these social organizations and the transformation of the city’s spatial structure from the Meiji period onward.  In other words, upcoming sessions will discuss the modernization of the traditional city of Osaka.  I hope that you enjoy the lectures.


第 4 回:近世④「仲間―薬種中買仲間」

まえおき

 前回は、近世都市の基礎単位である「町」について道修町3丁目を事例に紹介しましたが、今回は、もう一つの基本的な社会結合である「仲間」について考えてみようと思います。商人や職人の「株仲間」だけでなく、宗教者や芸能者、あるいは非人身分やかわた身分の仲間などもありました。文化5(1808)年の「町奉行所旧記」には、米や青物・魚、薬種や油の問屋・仲買など流通関係の株仲間、両替屋や質屋などの金融関係の仲間、茶屋・風呂屋・旅籠屋などの株仲間など、江戸時代後期の株仲間が網羅的に書き上げられており、多様で多数の株仲間が存在していたことがわかります。ここでは、その一例として、道修町1~3丁目に集住していた薬種中買仲間を取り上げます。

 

1.株仲間とは?

 「株仲間」は、様々な職種の「株」を所有する者によって構成された組合のことです。「株」とは基本的にはさまざまな職業の営業権のことで、株数の限定の無い場合もありましたが、多くは株数の限定があり、仲間の構成員(株主)によってその職種の営業が独占され、仲間外の商人や職人は排除されるというのが原則でした。

渡辺祥子作成

 近世前半からいろいろな職種で株仲間は形成されましたが、幕府が盛んに公認を始めたのは、18世紀中頃です。しかし、天保改革の物価引下げの目玉政策として、天保13(1842)年に株仲間解散令が出されます。嘉永4(1851)年には再興されますが、この解散令が出されていた時期に活発に活動を展開しはじめた仲間外の商人・職人を無視することはできず、軒数制限はされませんでした。

 株仲間では、町と同じように営業や組織に関わる仲間内法(申合せ等)が作られました。また、業種によって組織は異なりますが、「年行司」や「月行司」などの役職があって、仲間内の世話や統制にあたりました。今回は株仲間の一例として、道修町1~3丁目に集住していた薬種中買仲間について見ることにします。

 

2.薬種中買仲間とは?

 道修町2丁目に神農さんとも呼ばれる少彦名神社がありますが、祀られているのは中国の薬の神様=神農神です。ここはもともと仲間の会所(事務所)だったところに、安永9(1780)年に京都の五条天神社から少彦名命を勧請したもので、その後もずっと仲間会所の役割を果たし続け、仲間で作られた膨大な史料を残してきました。現在はくすりの道修町資料館がつくられ、それらの史料が保存・展示されています。

 17世紀後半には、道修町周辺には薬種屋が集まっていました。薬種屋は、漢方薬の原料となる生薬を売買するもので、飲み薬・塗り薬などの売薬業とは異なります。この時期、薬種は長崎から輸入される唐薬種が中心でしたが、18世紀に入ると日本でも各地で薬種が生産されるようになり、和薬種として流通していきます。しかし、こうした和薬種のにせもの(偽薬種)や毒薬を防ぎ、品質を保証するため、享保7(1722)年に幕府は和薬改会所を設置します。大坂では、薬種の品質を見分ける能力を持った中買124人がこの和薬改会所の運営を担う存在として役割を与えられました。これをきっかけに、薬種中買仲間が公認されることになります。その後、元文3(1738年)年に和薬改会所が廃止された後も薬種中買仲間自体は存続されました。

 では、この当時の薬種の流通における中買の役割について見ていきましょう。 輸入薬種の流通のあり方を示した次の図を見てください。

渡辺祥子作成

 長崎で輸入された唐薬種は、全て幕府が買い付けて、それを長崎会所という機関で、本商人と呼ばれる特権商人が入札で買い取ります。本商人とは、初期の糸割符制において特権を認められた五ヶ所、つまり堺・長崎・京都 ・江戸・大坂の、5つの都市の商人たちで、大坂には15名程度いました。この本商人たちが落札した荷物は、ほぼすべてが大坂の唐薬問屋に送られ、そこから大坂の薬種中買や江戸をはじめとする諸国の薬種問屋などに売り捌かれました。ただし、唐薬問屋自身は売買の仲介をする存在であり、自分が買い取るわけではありません。また、唐薬問屋は薬種だけでなく、様々な輸入品の売買も仲介しており、全員合わせて約200軒前後で株仲間を形成していました。

 薬種中買は、唐薬問屋を通して「櫃」と呼ばれる大きな木製の箱の単位で唐薬種を買い取り、中身の品質を吟味した上で、小さな袋に小分けして大坂市中や全国に売り捌くことを生業としていました。唐薬問屋はあくまで仲介役で、本商人から送られてくる櫃を、そのままの単位で薬種中買などの買い手に渡すので、薬種中買のように櫃の中身の品質を吟味するような能力を持ち合わせてはいませんでした。唐薬問屋からの商品の売出し、これは薬種中買からみれば買出しと呼ばれますが、この売出し・買出しの時に、商品の平均重量を決める「正味廻し」や、値段を決める「直組」などが行われます。これは諸国での取引方法や相場にも影響を与える重要な取り決めでした。このように唐薬種の流通における薬種中買仲間の役割は大変大きいものでした。また諸国問屋などから大坂に入ってくる和薬種の取引でも、薬種中買仲間は重要な位置を占めていたのですが、ここでは省略します。

 

3.薬種中買仲間と史料

 薬種中買仲間は多様な史料を作成し、3万点余りの膨大な史料が現在も残されています。その一部を、ここで紹介します。

寛政11年12月「薬種中買仲間人数帳」より
くすりの道修町資料館所蔵

 これは寛政11(1799)年12月の「薬種中買仲間人数帳」という史料です。幕府から公認された株仲間は、公認された経緯や守るべき事項を記し、仲間のメンバーが連印した人数帳を町奉行所に提出します。そのときに提出用とは別に、仲間のほうで保管するためにもう一冊作るのですが、この史料はそうして仲間会所に保管されていたものです。薬種中買仲間の場合、毒薬や偽薬種を取り扱わないことや、和薬種の取扱いについての注意を記すとともに、享保7年に和薬改め会所の設置に伴って、仲間として公認された経緯を記しています。

 薬種中買仲間は元々124株だったのですが、この時に5株増やすことが認められ、129人が署名しています。相続や売買などで株所持者が変わると貼紙で訂正されます。また、株の名前人が幼少などの場合、代判人といって代わりに押印する者がいる場合があるのですが、その代判人が替わる時や、株所持者が転宅した時などにも、同様に貼り紙で修正されました。そのため、年月が経つと多くの修正が発生して、貼り紙が増えて帳面は見づらくなります。そこで、15~20年くらいに一度、新たに作り直して町奉行所に提出していました。

 これは、「町」で作成される土地台帳である水帳でも、相続や売買で家持が変わると、貼紙で届け出て修正されていたのと同じ取り扱いです。また、町ごとに作成される規約があるのと同じように、株仲間も仲間内で規約を作っていました。

 薬種中買仲間の自律的な申合せ・規約としては、例えば、「諸事申合控帳」という帳面が残っています。その宝暦2(1752)年7月の記述のなかで、「新店を出そうとする者が1丁目から3丁目の道修町筋に明き店がない場合には、当面、3町内の横町に居住することで許可するが、通筋に明き屋が有り次第引っ越すこと」という規定があります。ここで注目されるのは、薬種中買仲間のメンバーは、道修町1丁目から3丁目に居住しなければならない、しかも(南北の)横町ではなく、通り筋が原則だという点です。株仲間の場合、商売上の都合で居住すればよいことが多いのですが、薬種中買の場合は同職集住の強い規制が行われています。その理由は、商売上のやり方を相互に吟味する「友(共)吟味」を行うためだとしています。彼らは、同業者としての共通する利害を持っていましたが、実はそれだけではなく、お互いに商品を売ったり買ったりしあう商売相手でもあり、互いに警戒する必要もあったのです。そのため、本家を中心に、のれん分けされた別家たちが関連職種も含めて一統として結束して営業を行うことも見られました。

 また、仲間で作成される史料として、他の仲間との関係を規定するような規約もあります。たとえば寛延2(1749)年の「三方申合条目」という史料があります。

寛延2年「三方申合条目」より
くすりの道修町資料館所蔵

 これは末尾に「此度本商人方・中買方・問屋方、三方申談相究」めたので、違反しないこと、と記されており、「本商人中」、薬種中買仲間、唐薬問屋仲間の三者が署判しています。この条目は取引全体に関する規定ではなく、三者間で揉め事の起こりやすい「手目入引」という値引き法や計量の方法、あるいは量の少ない端物や荒物の扱いなどを重点的に決めています。唐薬種の流通について三者は相互に強い結びつきを持っていましたが、同時に三者間でも利害の衝突が起こり、それをまとめて解決するために申合せが行われたのだと考えられます。薬種中買仲間では、こうした様々な史料が仲間として作成され、仲間の会所で管理・保存されてきたのです。

4.まとめ

 はじめに触れたように、道修町の街角に立つと、現在も製薬会社のビルがたくさん集まっているのが分かります。唐薬問屋は唐薬種の売買の仲介をしただけなのに対して、薬種中買商は薬種の品質を吟味する能力を身につけていたのが、近代に入って製薬企業に転身していく条件をなしていたものと考えられます。

 ここまで4回にわたって、多様な史料を残す基礎的な社会集団のあり方を中軸として、江戸時代の大坂の社会構造の特徴を紹介してきました。また、都市空間のあり方や道頓堀の繁華街としてのあり方、道修町界隈のあり方などが、現在にまでつながってくることも紹介しました。そうした社会集団や都市空間が明治以降、どうなっていくのか、つまりは伝統都市の近代化についての具体像は、次回以降に紹介されます。どうぞ、お楽しみに。